Should JavaScript Be Split into Core and Advanced Versions for Better Performance?

October 23, 2024

JavaScript has long been a cornerstone of web development, playing a pivotal role in creating interactive and dynamic webpages. As the language has evolved, it has faced recurring challenges related to complexity, performance, security, and stability. Now, an intriguing proposal aims to address these issues by splitting JavaScript into two distinct versions: a core language known as “JS0” and a more advanced, tool-driven variant called “JSSugar.” This proposal has sparked a significant debate within the developer community.

The Proposal: Simplifying JavaScript’s Foundation

Shu-yu Guo, a staff software engineer at Google, presented a noteworthy proposal to the ECMAScript standardization committee (TC39) to split JavaScript into two branches. The primary motivation behind this proposal is to streamline JavaScript by separating its core functionalities from advanced features that can complicate and potentially jeopardize security and performance. Under the proposal, the core language, JS0, would be managed by runtime engines, ensuring that basic functions run smoothly and efficiently. Conversely, JSSugar would encompass the advanced features, compiled down to JS0 through the use of tooling.

The separation aims to create a more secure and performant JavaScript ecosystem by stripping the core language of complex features that might introduce vulnerabilities or degrade performance. With JS0 acting as the lean core, the focus could be placed on maintaining a clean, efficient runtime environment. Meanwhile, developers would still have access to advanced features and syntactic sugar through JSSugar, compiled into JS0 by various tools. This approach aims to achieve a balance between keeping the core simple and secure while allowing for more complex functionalities through supplementary tools.

Addressing Performance and Security Concerns

The proliferation of new language features in JavaScript has often led to unintended consequences, such as performance degradation and increased security risks. Virtual machines (VMs) tasked with running JavaScript code can struggle to accommodate new functionalities, which in turn may compromise their efficiency. Moreover, the growing complexity of the language can create security vulnerabilities that are difficult to manage and resolve. By isolating the core components in JS0, the proposal aims to enhance both performance and security within the JavaScript ecosystem.

A streamlined JS0 would allow for a more straightforward, manageable runtime environment, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities and maintaining high performance across the board. Security initiatives could be more concentrated and effective in a simpler language core, free from the bloat added by numerous advanced features. As a result, this approach could mitigate many of the negative impacts that rapid feature expansion has previously brought to the table. The ultimate goal is to deliver a more robust and efficient JavaScript experience, bolstering the confidence of developers who depend on it for their work.

The Role of Tooling in Modern JavaScript Development

In today’s development environment, many JavaScript developers already rely heavily on tools like TypeScript, Babel, and Webpack, which transform code into more efficient forms that are compatible with different environments. The proposed split into JS0 and JSSugar effectively formalizes these existing practices by differentiating between the core language and its tool-extended counterpart. Developers would continue to write code in the more expressive JSSugar, which would then be compiled into the leaner JS0, taking advantage of modern tooling.

This process leverages tooling to grant developers the conveniences of advanced features without compromising the core language’s simplicity and security. In essence, the proposal does not introduce an entirely new concept but rather organizes and underscores the importance of the intermediate tools developers already use. By doing so, it aims to promote a more structured and efficient workflow while maintaining a secure and performant core language.

Impacts on Developer Workflow

The proposed changes are poised to have significant implications for how developers approach JavaScript. On one hand, it would entail a greater reliance on intermediate tooling, potentially altering standard practices in development workflows. This shift could require tool implementers to play a more active role in the standards process, possibly leading to the formation of a new technical group dedicated to JSSugar’s evolution. Such a group would be responsible for ensuring that the extended language remains aligned with the core standards and continues to evolve in a way that benefits the broader community.

While some developers may find this increased dependency on tools to be daunting, others could appreciate the enhanced focus on stability and security in the core language. The proposal highlights a growing trend in the software development community: leveraging tools to extend the capabilities of a language while maintaining a simpler, more stable core. This approach could pave the way for a more modular system where different aspects of the language are developed and refined independently, yet cohesively.

Community Reactions and Industry Perspectives

Reaction to the proposal has been decidedly mixed within the developer community. On one side, some developers welcome the focus on improving JavaScript’s core stability and security, believing such measures to be necessary for a language so critical to web development. They argue that a more secure and performant core would ultimately benefit the entire ecosystem. However, others worry that the split may introduce additional complexity and dependency on tools, potentially undermining the straightforwardness of “vanilla” JavaScript.

This division within the community reflects broader debates about the future of software development and the balance between simplicity and advanced features. The proposal underscores a fundamental tension between the desire to keep the language accessible and the need to evolve and incorporate new functionalities. As the conversation unfolds, it becomes evident that any decision will have far-reaching implications for developers, tooling vendors, and users alike.

Corporate Influences and Preferred Solutions

Although the proposal was brought forward by multiple organizations, including Mozilla, Apple, Moddable, and Sony, it appears that Google’s interests significantly drive it. Google’s endorsement of the split underscores its commitment to maintaining high-performance, secure internet experiences, a goal that aligns with the priorities of other major tech companies. Despite the proposal being put forth by several stakeholders, it’s important to recognize that this is a solution preferred by Google, not an unanimously agreed-upon approach among all JavaScript implementers.

Different companies might have varying perspectives on the best path forward, reflecting their unique priorities and use cases. Some may see the split as a necessary evolution to address longstanding issues in the JavaScript ecosystem, while others might be more cautious, wary of the potential disruptions and dependencies it could introduce. Understanding these corporate influences can provide valuable context for the community’s mixed reactions and the broader discussions about the future of JavaScript.

Evolution of Programming Languages and Future Trends

JavaScript has long been a cornerstone of web development, essential for creating interactive and dynamic webpages. Its evolution, however, has brought recurring challenges regarding complexity, performance, security, and stability. To address these issues, a compelling new proposal has emerged: splitting JavaScript into two distinct versions. The first version, known as “JS0,” would serve as the core language, focusing on essential functions and simplicity. The second version, called “JSSugar,” would be a more advanced, tool-driven variant designed for developers looking to utilize cutting-edge features and enhanced capabilities. This proposal has ignited a spirited debate within the developer community.

Proponents argue that the bifurcation could streamline development, making the core language more accessible and efficient for newcomers while offering advanced users a robust toolkit for more complex tasks. Critics, however, worry that this split could fragment the JavaScript ecosystem, leading to compatibility issues and confusion. Despite the divided opinions, the discussion underscores the ongoing need to balance innovation with simplicity and stability in the ever-evolving world of web development.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later